Racial preferences in dating racist

06-Aug-2017 02:58

But we live in a world in which Google and Apple are bound up with and in some ways beholden to the government.I worry when a lot of news travels through a handful of choke points.This block is thought to be highly violent and well armed.They also believe that certain people are legitimately inferior to the them and are now causing them to be pariahs.We are shunning people for not shunning those with bad ideologies strongly enough.Our preferred equilibrium, given the preferences of the most passionate individuals, seems to be for creating a block of unemployable individuals locked out of commercial relations.You forgot the part where in order to feel morally superior, you have to keep shoving people into that “Deplorable” bag, and it already contains a supermajority of the American population.

racial preferences in dating racist-72racial preferences in dating racist-55racial preferences in dating racist-61

When Facebook and Twitter regulate what can be said on their platforms and Google and Apple regulate who can provide a platform, we have a big problem.You mean like black people under Jim Crow, and (to a much lesser extent) still today?One could make an argument that the treatment of people with felony convictions combined with aggressive prosecution of black people for drug crimes, is a backdoor mechanism that acts to keep blacks out of the job market. creating a block of unemployable individuals locked out of commercial relations.You had restrictive covenants on real estate here there and the next place (from about 1910 to 1948). So your argument is that Jim Crow was a good policy, just applied to the wrong group?Where they were really ‘locked out’ was large swaths of public employment in the South (the Post Office the major exception) and also the Southern state universities. The problems blacks face have to do with deficits of public order, and that’s a government failure. Also you’re failing to make what seems to me to be a critical distinction between speech and action here.

When Facebook and Twitter regulate what can be said on their platforms and Google and Apple regulate who can provide a platform, we have a big problem.You mean like black people under Jim Crow, and (to a much lesser extent) still today?One could make an argument that the treatment of people with felony convictions combined with aggressive prosecution of black people for drug crimes, is a backdoor mechanism that acts to keep blacks out of the job market. creating a block of unemployable individuals locked out of commercial relations.You had restrictive covenants on real estate here there and the next place (from about 1910 to 1948). So your argument is that Jim Crow was a good policy, just applied to the wrong group?Where they were really ‘locked out’ was large swaths of public employment in the South (the Post Office the major exception) and also the Southern state universities. The problems blacks face have to do with deficits of public order, and that’s a government failure. Also you’re failing to make what seems to me to be a critical distinction between speech and action here.It’s as if the NYTimes and the Washington Post were the only major newspapers and the government regulated who could own a printing press.